This is a demo store. No orders will be fulfilled.

Different fixatives influence morphology, antigen preservation, and TUNEL staining in chicken (Gallus gallus) testis

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA [2021]
Xian-Zhou Feng, Wei-Yong Wang, Ting Gong, Li-Jie Meng
ABSTRACT

The optimized fixative for testis is still controversial. This study investigated the effects of Modified Davidson’s Fluid (mDF), 4% Paraformaldehyde (4% PFA), and Bouin’s Fluid (BF) fixatives on chicken testes in normal/cadmium (Cd) feeding groups using hematoxylin and eosin (HE), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and Terminal Transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) staining. Compared to the mDF, we established that the testes fixed with 4% PFA and BF in the normal group had severe shrinkage in tubular and interstitial compartments. Moreover, compared with 4% PFA, the number of GATA4-positive Sertoli cells/mm 2 reduced by 67.61% in mDF and 80.57% in BF for one seminiferous tubule . The TUNEL assay illustrated that more positive cells/mm 2 in mDF group (28.47 ± 11.38) than in 4% PFA (10.49 ± 7.89). In Cd-treated testes, mDF showed more morphological details than 4% PFA and BF. In contrast, the number of GATA4-positive Sertoli cells/mm 2 of 4% PFA was higher than that of mDF by 65.78% and BF by 64.80% in a seminiferous tubule. The number of TUNEL positive cells/mm 2 in mDF (272.60 ± 34.41) were higher than in 4% PFA (175.91 ± 19.87). These results suggest that mDF fixative is suitable for normal and Cd-treated testis fixation for HE and TUNEL staining in chicken, whereas 4% PFA fixative is better for IHC examination.

MATERIALS

Shall we send you a message when we have discounts available?

Remind me later

Thank you! Please check your email inbox to confirm.

Oops! Notifications are disabled.